Morgan Freeman's team accuses CNN of defamation.
Understanding Authorship Order in Peer-Reviewed Journals
Load more...
.
The created infrastructure allows you to place two blocks or your own ads through the service. Subsequently, it was abandoned, leaving only the block, which is now prohibited from being configured. But everything is more interesting at first. The person just published his story, comment. Stories or scientific materials, Zen Buddhism spreads traffic on it, and advertising blocks bring money, which is the author’s reward. Compared with websites with a large audience and a strong domain, the advantage of is that the developer introduces an algorithm that determines the user’s interests and invites him to read content that he might be interested in. People like it because through the platform you can get a personalized summary. If you stay away from politics, you won’t receive news about Ukraine, but if you are a fan of the club, then in the first row you will summarize yesterday’s Juventus game. This scheme guarantees the growth of the author's audience and the search for people interested in his work. Then I thought of the idea of connecting the blog to the platform. If anyone does not understand, I will briefly explain it-this is when the website owner publishes an article on his blog and broadcasts it to third-party services via technology. Therefore, the postcard appears with and the user clicks on it and goes to the author's website. There, I read an article, gained knowledge, experience or just very happy. This format allows thousands of bloggers to not go anywhere or leave the site, but just drag and drop readers from it and make it their own blog. At that time, it was profitable for because the feed was full, the algorithm chose the cards based on their interests, and the reader eventually realized that there was a lot of Llangefni barramundi content available in. In this wave, I entered and also began to attract readers. In the future, in addition to my articles, I will publish the works of other authors that I have purchased from them. Because we wrote interesting topics and carefully checked the articles, my popularity exceeded the scale, and a year later, my daily blog had 260,000 readers. With so many authors, it is not difficult to meet the needs of any reader. The readers themselves suddenly exceed 50.01 million! The largest publication was immediately connected to the platform, and at the same time, in order to make money, people came and didn't even think about writing anything yesterday. Now you can buy a cheap rewrite on the exchange, throw it to the editor, and wait for funds. This immediately caused the problem. Multiply this number by the number of publications, and then add here the author who might become the author and the rewrites he purchased and the small bloggers like me who stole the traffic (I attract 260,000 readers every day !), the images we got were not satisfactory-it is impossible to provide your readers with every publication...
Excluding unethical authors and low-quality publications seems to be enough, and the balance will be restored. But the first attempt failed. Naturally, it is impossible to manually check thousands of publications, so the algorithm was charged and promoted. Initially, mine was disabled due to clickbait. They started to solve this problem manually, but before this became a reality, no one answered the template and they found that the algorithm was wrong. There is no sign of clickbait, I have recovered.
But many clicks are cut off, whether for click bait or for non-unique material. The second step is to disable blogs connected via, but not all, but not high-quality blogs. Allegedly, due to excessive advertising, I fell into the release again. The managers again concluded that the algorithm messed up something and that no ads would interfere with blog reading! I returned to the ranks of the author for the second time. It is worth noting that my blog was very popular at that time, customers sometimes wrote to me, the publications in the feed had disappeared, and they were waiting for new articles on financial knowledge, as well as my thoughts, stories and assumptions. After another three months, there was another battle that had nothing to do with me. Then Zen was obviously tired and decided to cut down drastically. We have proposed a rule according to which blogs that do not reach 10,000 readers each day cannot enter the platform. Since 2-3 million people came to me through searches, social networks and direct requests, they turned me away and had no right to recover. Hundreds of other authors were deleted with me. But no one noticed this shortcoming, because large publications can easily replace our publications, publishing up to 401 articles per day.
Due to the circulation of these publications, readers have increased to 64.01 million, and with the help of crazy algorithms, a considerable number of authors have been attracted forever. The balance is restored and everyone is happy. The advertising budget for the project is huge, the audience is tamed, and the content is available. But this leads to other problems that have not been resolved so far. Zen is called a garbage dump. Is this reasonable?
I myself used to read several authors often, but then disappeared somewhere. They published very interesting observations and thoughts on psychology, marketing and topics. This is what interests me. It is replaced by a -2 message. The quality of the content has become very low and most importantly useless. This material has no practical benefits or knowledge.
The support team recommends that you like authors you like and block content that you don’t like. But the problem is different-there are no longer hundreds of cool authors who are not ready to replace their blogs with clumsy platforms. They returned to their website because you drove them out. Why did you decide that I should read the content approved by the algorithm. Moreover, I hope that my author and I must follow them as a whole, and the feed is full of news.
It is not a political scientist, it is not an expert writing, but a person who rewrites it from tape.
There is a view that you are not satisfied with new authors and stop them in every possible way. This is definitely not the case. Is waiting for new authors, but now it will not disturb anyone reading them. The platform no longer needs it, it doesn't care. Only with the audience can you find a place. For example, you are a famous artist or a large bank. You can then post notes, stories or full text by reposting to social networks. Many fans and customers will read your content, but it is just a way to provide content. When there are many subscribers and readers spread your posts across the, the algorithm will start adding impressions in. Then you will succeed. Little writers will have to stay on the blog and write for 301 readers, and you should not expect more authors.
Because I am interested in psychology, I certainly understand that my observations may be wrong. For this reason, I have expressed their views in this publication. Maybe we can solve this problem together.
What the gods will not do for you is what you can do for yourself. ”Next article The first free trade in auction and trading! Understanding Authorship Order in Peer-Reviewed Journals